Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), also known as chronic obstructive lung disease (COLD), chronic obstructive airway disease (COAD), chronic airflow limitation (CAL) and chronic obstructive respiratory disease (CORD), is the co-occurrence of chronic bronchitis and emphysema, a pair of commonly co-existing diseases of the lungs in which the airways become narrowed. This leads to a limitation of the flow of air to and from the lungs, causing shortness of breath (dyspnea). In clinical practice, COPD is defined by its characteristically low airflow on lung function tests. In contrast to asthma, this limitation is poorly reversible and usually gets progressively worse over time. In England, an estimated 842,100 of 50 million people have a diagnosis of COPD.
MMS: CON OR CURE? CLINICAL TRIAL RESULTS (Part 1)
Transcript:
MMS! Monstrous Con or Miraculous Cure?
Okay guys, it’s time to cut through all the crap and the hype with regard to the whole controversy about MMS Miracle Mineral Solution, or now better known as chlorine dioxide.
Thousands of testimonials, all set up. All lies. All these people have been paid to say all this stuff by Jim Humble and all his colleagues out there.
Is it all a conspiracy?
Is it a massive con?
Is drinking chlorine dioxide, which tastes like bleach, is that actually the same as chlorine?
Let’s find out after this cutscene.
Hi, welcome back guys.
Now listen, if you’ve come to this because you’ve done a search for MMS, you’ve come to the right place because we’re going to give you the facts, not the hype.
We’re going to deal with what we actually know for sure.
My name is Andy Harrell, and to cut a long story short, I have a whole bunch of YouTube videos which chart my progress for reversing prostate cancer.
I was using bicarb, a plant-based diet, hence the T-shirt, powered by plants.
I cut out all the carcinogenic crap, all the processed foods, stopped drinking alcohol, and did a lot of vegetable and fruit juicing, and by doing that I was able to reverse my PSA condition, which had got to 5.29, the cancer had come back after being treated through orthodox medicine.
I refused that, and in 24 days, on this protocol, got my PSA down from 5.29 to 0.65.
That is pretty much in irrelevance now, because we’re 18 months on, my bloods are still great, my cholesterol is fantastic, my blood pressure is fantastic, all my vital signs are good, my liver function, kidney function, everything is great.
Right, okay, that’s a done deal.
18 months on, I’ve been getting a lot of feedback from you guys in the community about MMS.
And to be honest, looking at all the hype, I was sucked in by the whole thing and thought, well, I’m going to give this a go.
And then we had some success with MMS.
To be honest, we were taking it for about three weeks.
I’d noticed a huge improvement in my condition.
My partner noticed a huge improvement in her COPD using a nebuliser.
And then our sister-in-law came to visit for a week.
She has had tummy problems and gut issues.
And I said to her, try the MMS, you know, because it worked for me.
And she wouldn’t do it because she was worried about all the negative information that’s out on the web and through the media and the fact that someone had actually died taking MMS.
She wouldn’t want to get involved in this.
And, you know, I can understand that.
It’s completely normal.
But what are the facts regarding MMS?
First thing to look for when you’re trying to establish the facts regarding anything that is controversial is clinical trials.
Clinical trials done independently by scientists in a laboratory working on either humans or animals and looking at what the effects of these things are on the physiology of either the animal or the human.
Now, there’s been four clinical trials and one has been done on 123 humans.
And that was in 1982.
All the links to these are below these clinical trials, 1982.
And there’s been three more done on animals, predominantly on rats.
So, you know, what use that is, I’m not sure.
But it does actually show that even on laboratory animals the conclusions were pretty much the same as the human trials.
The reasons these clinical trials were done was because they were looking at the possibility of getting rid of the chlorine in our water and using chlorine dioxide instead as a safer alternative.
We know how toxic chlorine is, especially when it reacts with organic compounds.
So to change that to chlorine dioxide in the hope of actually having less harm on the population seemed like a good option.
That’s why the clinical trials were done.
And I do have to say that, again, this is a fact-based video.
Since doing these trials, four of them now in all, four European countries now use chlorine dioxide exclusively as a purification system.
France, Germany, Holland and Italy.
A lot of other countries, including the one I’m in, Spain, occasionally use it.
It depends on the municipality that you’re in.
And in the USA, there are a great number of states now using chlorine dioxide in their water supply as opposed to elemental chlorine.
So the fact that it’s being used to replace chlorine and not use the elemental chlorine they’re using chlorine dioxide instead in so many different places throughout the world now does suggest that if they’re giving it to us in the water, it is safer than chlorine.
That’s a fact.
Now, let’s get back to what we know from these clinical studies that have been done.
Let me read you what those studies actually do say.
The animal test conclusion from the one done in Hungary said chlorine dioxide is a size-selective anti-macrobial agent which kill micron-sized organisms rapidly but cannot harm much larger organisms like animals or humans as it is not able to penetrate deeply into their living tissues.
Moreover, the circulation of multicellular organisms can provide an additional protection to these organisms against chlorine dioxide.
It is the aim of the present work to initiate further clinical studies hoping that chlorine dioxide could be applied to treat various local infections especially where bacterial resistance through antibiotics is a problem.
We have already obtained official permission to start such studies.
Another great point here, antibiotics, we all know the problem with antibiotics.
They are becoming a real problem because of bacterial resistance that we have in our systems through the food chain and also only taking antibiotics for any infection that we seem to get.
That destroys the gut flora and everything else.
The great thing about chlorine dioxide from what this clinical trial has just said is that you don’t become resistant to chlorine dioxide.
So it is a purification that bacteria has no resistance against.
That is a very exciting development and if that progresses further it may be that chlorine dioxide in the future could replace a lot of antibiotics.
So that is something that you have really got to pay attention to.
Next study, which is the one on the human, this is the human trial that they did.
The careful clinical evaluation of every subject failed to reveal any clinical important impact upon the medical well-being of any subject as a result of the disinfectant ingestion.
Hemoglobin electrophosphocyst results indicated that a small number of subjects yielded abnormal hemoglobin distributions.
But these individuals were found to be randomly distributed in both treatment groups and in the placebo control group.
Examination of electrocardiograms revealed no abnormalities.
Vital signs, that’s blood pressure, pulse rate, respiration rate and body temperature were measured on a regular basis.
The compiled vital signs were examined for evidence of consistent response to treatment.
No such evidence was found.
So this is done on humans and they found no evidence to suggest there was any problem with the vital signs or the control group versus the placebo group.
So the conclusion that they came to during the course of the three-phase study, a massive volume of raw data was acquired.
No definitive finding of detrimental physiological impact was made on any of the three phases of this human investigation.
Within the limits of the study, the relative safety of the oral ingestion of chlorine dioxide was demonstrated by the absence of detrimental physiological response.
So here we go.
We have an independent clinical trial, science-based, laboratory-based, loads of raw data.
The studies suggest that ingesting this stuff does not cause a problem.
But, and this is a massive but, folks.
This MMS solution is available worldwide.
And if you start mixing this up and you don’t know what you are doing and you take too much, can that be a problem?
I suggest it probably could.
In the case of this lady, she may have had two drops, she may have had 20 drops.
We don’t know what she had.
What they claim and what the actual ingestion was, we are not sure.
The reality is she is dead.
It was, according to the autopsy report, almost certainly as a result of the MMS.
Now, let’s not get overly excited about this.
It’s a tragedy.
When anyone dies, it’s a tragedy.
But let’s put this into perspective.
Four hundred and forty three thousand Americans died last year as a direct result of prescription medicine.
And do you know what the facts are?
That if you overdo anything, you are very likely to cause yourself a serious problem.
MMS: CON OR CURE? CLINICAL TRIAL RESULTS (Part 2)
Transcript:
So, if you don’t believe the clinical trials are going to be accurate and the chlorine dioxide is still going to cause a problem, what about the people that actually do the science-based research to look at the whole concept of water purification systems that supply water purification systems for municipalities?
Now, there’s a company called Lentec. It’s a 25-year-old business based in the Netherlands.
They supply industrial municipal water solutions for populations throughout the world.
Their own research scientists advise that chlorine dioxide is the safest form of water purification.
It goes on to say, if you want the facts about the safety of chlorine dioxide, read the text below and we shall do that now.
Now, they go on to say that chlorine dioxide is an oxidizing biocide and not a metabolic toxin. This means that chlorine dioxide kills microorganisms by disruption of the transport of nutrients across the cell wall, not by disruption of a metabolic process.
Chlorine dioxide can be effectively used in much higher organic loading than either ozone or chlorine because of its selectivity.
Chlorine dioxide is clearly superior to chlorine in the destruction of spores, bacteria, viruses and other pathogen organisms on an equal residual base. The required contact time for chlorine dioxide is lower. Chlorine dioxide has better solubility. No corrosion associated with high chlorine concentrations. Is better at removing iron and magnesium compounds than chlorine.
So that’s another fact-based evidence that chlorine dioxide is safer than chlorine.
But what is safe? How much are they putting in the water? How much chlorine dioxide are they putting in the water that is actually perceived as safe for us?
This is the key thing. We are 70% water. Our blood is made up with water, which in weight terms is about 70% of our make-up.
So they are supplying chlorine dioxide to us. We’re drinking it and that’s a safe amount.
We need somewhere between the stuff that they are putting in the water that we are drinking anyway and the stuff that is being used to medicate people to get rid of parasites, viruses, infections, mold, bacteria, you name it. Somewhere between what they are putting in the water and what we are actually taking is going to be an amount that we can tolerate.
People get serious side effects as a result of taking chlorine dioxide is if they are taking too much. Because you will kill off, from the evidence that we have seen here, we are going to be killing off viruses, bacteria, mold, parasites, fungus, you name it. We are going to be killing off loads of stuff. That is all processed by the liver and the kidneys. You overload that a lot, you are going to get ill.
So if you start doing too much too soon, my god, you are going to get sick. That is a fact.
Now, in the case of serious illness, if you start on a big dose, you are going to be causing yourself a problem. So you have to rain that right back and start to build up slowly so your body can actually start to get the hang of what this is all about. You got to actually start killing stuff off real slow so you don’t infect the kidneys and the liver.
And the recommendation is to start with one drop. Even if you did one drop a day, split into eight hours with little doses every hour, that is enough to start with to actually see how you get on with that. And then the next day, maybe take two drops. See how you get on with that.
So we have got to start to work with the facts here, not conjecture. Conjecture is a real problem because it is stopping people that genuinely can get well by using this stuff from getting well because of all the negative influences about the fact that it is toxic in high doses.
Let’s talk turkey here. You take too much of this stuff, it could really harm you. So let’s forget the hype, forget the facts, forget the clinical trials for a minute. Forget everything that you have heard so far. Let’s assume that this is a massive con.
Let’s assume that Jim Humble set out years ago to con us into believing that MMS was going to be a cure for everything.
How crazy is it that a guy who has had his background setting out to con the entire world with a solution called MMS, why would he put the name chlorine in the freaking title? Chlorine by definition is going to scare off everyone into thinking, I am not going to go around drinking bleach. Is he completely mad? Why would Jim Humble do that?
Why would he not use something like iodine solution or magnesium solution or ozone therapy or something? Why put chlorine in the bloody name?
Unbelievably stupid.
And then, let’s have a look at these testimonials. Are they all lies? Are they all deceit? Are they all set up? Are these people actually sitting there, thousands and thousands of people sitting there, spilling stuff that has been carefully prepared and scripted for them, speaking the lines?
I don’t think they are. The more of these testimonials I look at, the more convincing these people are about the fact that MMS has helped them.
You know what? I looked at one last night. In fact there was two that I looked at last night. One was a sequence of videos that had been done by a lady documenting her MMS results over a period of one year and seven months. I looked at the one that she did first off and she looks absolutely horrific. And she’s had all sorts of problems with intestines and gut problems and parasites and all. Anyway, autoimmune disease is everything. One year, seven months on, she looks brilliant and says how fantastic it is. And she’s been using it for one year and seven months. Great. Loads and loads of viewings.
I’ve got a link to that one down below. Take a look at her. If she’s lying, this lady, she is a class one Oscar performer because no one could sit like she has done in front of a camera and tell those sorts of lies for such a long period of time by being paid to do it.
Now the other one is a lady called Joan, or Joanie as she wants to be called. This lady has got 186 separate videos of testimonials of her journey of recovery from a ropeworm intestinal problem.
If you look at those videos that she’s done, there’s 186 of them. How dumb would it be to get this lady to do 186 videos all stage managed to say how brilliant MMS is regarding her own condition and her journey and how she’s helped rid herself of these terrible ropeworm parasites.
When her viewing numbers, get this, her viewing numbers on these 186 videos average about 150. Really very low. In global terms, it doesn’t even make a dent.
And the reason is because she’s got no idea how to market her videos. What she’s done, she hasn’t put the word MMS in the title. She hasn’t put the word chlorine dioxin in the title. In the tags she hasn’t put the word MMS.
Except for one, one video where she says how to make chlorine dioxide. I tell you what, that one has got over 10,000 viewings. And on a global scale it makes a kind of small dent.
So this is someone that’s genuine. She hasn’t made it up. Take a look at the link to her video below.
I believe her and I believe the one that I was mentioning previously. I also believe most of these testimonials. I don’t think they’ve been stage managed. Maybe some of them have. But you know what, I don’t think so.
My experience with MMS over the last three or four weeks has been really quite good.
I did mention it on my last blog where I said that the gut function has improved. I was actually having blood in my poo for about two years.
Ten years ago I had colitis, an autoimmune disease problem. And that pretty much has gone away since I’ve been using the protocol to fix the prostate cancer using the juicing and going plant based. But I was still getting gripy feelings in the tummy. I was still getting a little bit of gas and discomfort from that sort of thing. So I started taking the MMS. Problem solved.
My partner started taking the MMS for COPD, which she’s been struggling with for about two years. And that’s been used on nebuliser, inhaling the chlorine dioxide gas. She’s really improved immeasurably on it.
So I stopped using it about a week ago when my partner’s sister came out and said that she was scared of using it. Whilst I did all the research and looked at the clinical trials.
Thank you for watching!