MMS: CON OR CURE? CLINICAL TRIAL RESULTS (Part 1)

Transcript:

MMS! Monstrous Con or Miraculous Cure?

Okay guys, it’s time to cut through all the crap and the hype with regard to the whole controversy about MMS Miracle Mineral Solution, or now better known as chlorine dioxide.

Thousands of testimonials, all set up. All lies. All these people have been paid to say all this stuff by Jim Humble and all his colleagues out there.

Is it all a conspiracy?

Is it a massive con?

Is drinking chlorine dioxide, which tastes like bleach, is that actually the same as chlorine?

Let’s find out after this cutscene.

Hi, welcome back guys.

Now listen, if you’ve come to this because you’ve done a search for MMS, you’ve come to the right place because we’re going to give you the facts, not the hype.

We’re going to deal with what we actually know for sure.

My name is Andy Harrell, and to cut a long story short, I have a whole bunch of YouTube videos which chart my progress for reversing prostate cancer.

I was using bicarb, a plant-based diet, hence the T-shirt, powered by plants.

I cut out all the carcinogenic crap, all the processed foods, stopped drinking alcohol, and did a lot of vegetable and fruit juicing, and by doing that I was able to reverse my PSA condition, which had got to 5.29, the cancer had come back after being treated through orthodox medicine.

I refused that, and in 24 days, on this protocol, got my PSA down from 5.29 to 0.65.

That is pretty much in irrelevance now, because we’re 18 months on, my bloods are still great, my cholesterol is fantastic, my blood pressure is fantastic, all my vital signs are good, my liver function, kidney function, everything is great.

Right, okay, that’s a done deal.

18 months on, I’ve been getting a lot of feedback from you guys in the community about MMS.

And to be honest, looking at all the hype, I was sucked in by the whole thing and thought, well, I’m going to give this a go.

And then we had some success with MMS.

To be honest, we were taking it for about three weeks.

I’d noticed a huge improvement in my condition.

My partner noticed a huge improvement in her COPD using a nebuliser.

And then our sister-in-law came to visit for a week.

She has had tummy problems and gut issues.

And I said to her, try the MMS, you know, because it worked for me.

And she wouldn’t do it because she was worried about all the negative information that’s out on the web and through the media and the fact that someone had actually died taking MMS.

She wouldn’t want to get involved in this.

And, you know, I can understand that.

It’s completely normal.

But what are the facts regarding MMS?

First thing to look for when you’re trying to establish the facts regarding anything that is controversial is clinical trials.

Clinical trials done independently by scientists in a laboratory working on either humans or animals and looking at what the effects of these things are on the physiology of either the animal or the human.

Now, there’s been four clinical trials and one has been done on 123 humans.

And that was in 1982.

All the links to these are below these clinical trials, 1982.

And there’s been three more done on animals, predominantly on rats.

So, you know, what use that is, I’m not sure.

But it does actually show that even on laboratory animals the conclusions were pretty much the same as the human trials.

The reasons these clinical trials were done was because they were looking at the possibility of getting rid of the chlorine in our water and using chlorine dioxide instead as a safer alternative.

We know how toxic chlorine is, especially when it reacts with organic compounds.

So to change that to chlorine dioxide in the hope of actually having less harm on the population seemed like a good option.

That’s why the clinical trials were done.

And I do have to say that, again, this is a fact-based video.

Since doing these trials, four of them now in all, four European countries now use chlorine dioxide exclusively as a purification system.

France, Germany, Holland and Italy.

A lot of other countries, including the one I’m in, Spain, occasionally use it.

It depends on the municipality that you’re in.

And in the USA, there are a great number of states now using chlorine dioxide in their water supply as opposed to elemental chlorine.

So the fact that it’s being used to replace chlorine and not use the elemental chlorine they’re using chlorine dioxide instead in so many different places throughout the world now does suggest that if they’re giving it to us in the water, it is safer than chlorine.

That’s a fact.

Now, let’s get back to what we know from these clinical studies that have been done.

Let me read you what those studies actually do say.

The animal test conclusion from the one done in Hungary said chlorine dioxide is a size-selective anti-macrobial agent which kill micron-sized organisms rapidly but cannot harm much larger organisms like animals or humans as it is not able to penetrate deeply into their living tissues.

Moreover, the circulation of multicellular organisms can provide an additional protection to these organisms against chlorine dioxide.

It is the aim of the present work to initiate further clinical studies hoping that chlorine dioxide could be applied to treat various local infections especially where bacterial resistance through antibiotics is a problem.

We have already obtained official permission to start such studies.

Another great point here, antibiotics, we all know the problem with antibiotics.

They are becoming a real problem because of bacterial resistance that we have in our systems through the food chain and also only taking antibiotics for any infection that we seem to get.

That destroys the gut flora and everything else.

The great thing about chlorine dioxide from what this clinical trial has just said is that you don’t become resistant to chlorine dioxide.

So it is a purification that bacteria has no resistance against.

That is a very exciting development and if that progresses further it may be that chlorine dioxide in the future could replace a lot of antibiotics.

So that is something that you have really got to pay attention to.

Next study, which is the one on the human, this is the human trial that they did.

The careful clinical evaluation of every subject failed to reveal any clinical important impact upon the medical well-being of any subject as a result of the disinfectant ingestion.

Hemoglobin electrophosphocyst results indicated that a small number of subjects yielded abnormal hemoglobin distributions.

But these individuals were found to be randomly distributed in both treatment groups and in the placebo control group.

Examination of electrocardiograms revealed no abnormalities.

Vital signs, that’s blood pressure, pulse rate, respiration rate and body temperature were measured on a regular basis.

The compiled vital signs were examined for evidence of consistent response to treatment.

No such evidence was found.

So this is done on humans and they found no evidence to suggest there was any problem with the vital signs or the control group versus the placebo group.

So the conclusion that they came to during the course of the three-phase study, a massive volume of raw data was acquired.

No definitive finding of detrimental physiological impact was made on any of the three phases of this human investigation.

Within the limits of the study, the relative safety of the oral ingestion of chlorine dioxide was demonstrated by the absence of detrimental physiological response.

So here we go.

We have an independent clinical trial, science-based, laboratory-based, loads of raw data.

The studies suggest that ingesting this stuff does not cause a problem.

But, and this is a massive but, folks.

This MMS solution is available worldwide.

And if you start mixing this up and you don’t know what you are doing and you take too much, can that be a problem?

I suggest it probably could.

In the case of this lady, she may have had two drops, she may have had 20 drops.

We don’t know what she had.

What they claim and what the actual ingestion was, we are not sure.

The reality is she is dead.

It was, according to the autopsy report, almost certainly as a result of the MMS.

Now, let’s not get overly excited about this.

It’s a tragedy.

When anyone dies, it’s a tragedy.

But let’s put this into perspective.

Four hundred and forty three thousand Americans died last year as a direct result of prescription medicine.

And do you know what the facts are?

That if you overdo anything, you are very likely to cause yourself a serious problem.